<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain .XXX Rejected by ICANN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.selaplana.com/2007/03/31/domain-xxx-rejected-by-icann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.selaplana.com/2007/03/31/domain-xxx-rejected-by-icann/</link>
	<description>Learn how I make money online by blogging at home in the Philippines - Sustines Laplana</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:49:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SELaplana</title>
		<link>http://www.selaplana.com/2007/03/31/domain-xxx-rejected-by-icann/#comment-37474</link>
		<dc:creator>SELaplana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 05:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selaplana.com/2007/03/31/domain-xxx-rejected-by-icann/#comment-37474</guid>
		<description>You got the points on rejecting the .xxx domains. Anyway, ICANN knows much about it.

thanks for dropping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got the points on rejecting the .xxx domains. Anyway, ICANN knows much about it.</p>
<p>thanks for dropping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwayne</title>
		<link>http://www.selaplana.com/2007/03/31/domain-xxx-rejected-by-icann/#comment-37411</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selaplana.com/2007/03/31/domain-xxx-rejected-by-icann/#comment-37411</guid>
		<description>It is a good idea but there are to many kinks that would have to be worked out, and by doing that it would only cause a bigger problem. The main thing would be having to classify what is porn. Some people view the sport illustrated swimsuit issue as porn. So that would cause a uproar with a lot of organizations. The other would be the cost that it would add to existing web sites to change. I think they require new websites to use the xxx domain though. Nice article and nice blog here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good idea but there are to many kinks that would have to be worked out, and by doing that it would only cause a bigger problem. The main thing would be having to classify what is porn. Some people view the sport illustrated swimsuit issue as porn. So that would cause a uproar with a lot of organizations. The other would be the cost that it would add to existing web sites to change. I think they require new websites to use the xxx domain though. Nice article and nice blog here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

