<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, Now Hates DMOZ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.selaplana.com/2007/09/28/google-now-hates-dmoz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.selaplana.com/2007/09/28/google-now-hates-dmoz/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online, Technology Stories, Products Review. (Southern Leyte's First E-Marketing and Blogging Experience - Direct from Maasin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:11:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DMOZ-IS-CORRUPT</title>
		<link>http://www.selaplana.com/2007/09/28/google-now-hates-dmoz/#comment-301537</link>
		<dc:creator>DMOZ-IS-CORRUPT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selaplana.com/2007/09/28/google-now-hates-dmoz/#comment-301537</guid>
		<description>It is nothing new. DMOZ corruption is organizational and most admins and metas are in it. With a price of DMOZ links at $100 or more, it is not hard to figure out how money these people make from their &quot;volunteer&quot; work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is nothing new. DMOZ corruption is organizational and most admins and metas are in it. With a price of DMOZ links at $100 or more, it is not hard to figure out how money these people make from their &#8220;volunteer&#8221; work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Ten Directories with Bulletproof PR? - WebProWorld</title>
		<link>http://www.selaplana.com/2007/09/28/google-now-hates-dmoz/#comment-112265</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Ten Directories with Bulletproof PR? - WebProWorld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selaplana.com/2007/09/28/google-now-hates-dmoz/#comment-112265</guid>
		<description>[...] time to add new listings. Just kidding, but only half kidding.  Cheers, MJ     I just read this link and other forum thread about DMOZ Penalization...    __________________ Great Prices of Diamonds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time to add new listings. Just kidding, but only half kidding.  Cheers, MJ     I just read this link and other forum thread about DMOZ Penalization&#8230;    __________________ Great Prices of Diamonds [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMOZ</title>
		<link>http://www.selaplana.com/2007/09/28/google-now-hates-dmoz/#comment-95865</link>
		<dc:creator>DMOZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selaplana.com/2007/09/28/google-now-hates-dmoz/#comment-95865</guid>
		<description>It has been resolved. It was not a 301 issue...nor a sign of the apocalypse or Google penalizing DMOZ ( though that does make for a great headline ).

http://blog.dmoz.org/2007/09/26/the-search-for-dmoz/

Also, Shoemoney&#039;s claim is baseless, false and pure linkbait...which you paid off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been resolved. It was not a 301 issue&#8230;nor a sign of the apocalypse or Google penalizing DMOZ ( though that does make for a great headline ).</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.dmoz.org/2007/09/26/the-search-for-dmoz/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.dmoz.org/2007/09/26/the-search-for-dmoz/</a></p>
<p>Also, Shoemoney&#8217;s claim is baseless, false and pure linkbait&#8230;which you paid off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging Experiment</title>
		<link>http://www.selaplana.com/2007/09/28/google-now-hates-dmoz/#comment-95089</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging Experiment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selaplana.com/2007/09/28/google-now-hates-dmoz/#comment-95089</guid>
		<description>Actually we have heard Google&#039;s word on the issue. It didn&#039;t have anything to do with Shoemoney or selling links. Dmoz had a 301 problem that apparently has now been fixed and in fact I think they&#039;re already back ranking for several terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually we have heard Google&#8217;s word on the issue. It didn&#8217;t have anything to do with Shoemoney or selling links. Dmoz had a 301 problem that apparently has now been fixed and in fact I think they&#8217;re already back ranking for several terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
